Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:43:10 -0600
From:      Eric F Crist <ecrist@secure-computing.net>
To:        Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IPFW/Divert problem...
Message-ID:  <405A9249-3680-48D9-9154-3149FCAB4367@secure-computing.net>
In-Reply-To: <17411194362935@webmail41.yandex.ru>
References:  <F23889F8-D6A6-4741-9D05-A60DE5D20967@secure-computing.net> <473009B2.40406@yandex.ru> <4C884976-8734-4112-8520-2E30893C0BE3@secure-computing.net> <47306CD0.7030301@yandex.ru> 1550000000237526643 <17411194362935@webmail41.yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:

> Eric F Crist wrote:
>>> In the your /etc/ipfw.sh script you should use "-f" flag when you  
>>> run
>>> ipfw flush command.
>> I am, but that has nothing to do with my problem.  My problem is  
>> that,
>> during system boot, I'm asked the following question:
>> Loading divert daemons Are you sure? [yn]:
>> The system sits there indefinitely until the question is answered.  I
>> need this to go away.
>
> Are you sure? Please, show your script. I think these is two different
> messages:
> 1) Loading divert daemons - probably from some of your third party  
> software
> start script.
> 2) Are you sure? [yn] - message from ipfw, when you run `ipfw flush`  
> in the
> /etc/ipfw.sh script.


So, I looked, and you were right, it was two different messages. I had  
"ipfw flush -f" rather than "ipfw -f flush".

Thank you, thank you, thank you!
-----
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?405A9249-3680-48D9-9154-3149FCAB4367>