Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:17:23 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) 32 @ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1990 Message-ID: <200906101917.26977.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200906101912.54960.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <3a142e750906090625r6586f15fn234e539dbbd57e73@mail.gmail.com> <3c1674c90906101601q68285c4ehad44dadc0d1a28e5@mail.gmail.com> <200906101912.54960.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 07:12 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Wednesday 10 June 2009 07:01 pm, Kip Macy wrote: > > A M_WAITOK allocation while holding a lock will do this. > > No, it does not because it may be used in interrupt handler context > with a spin lock held (e.g., GPE handler). I meant "a M_WAITOK allocation while holding a lock" is not the case here. It is "you shall not malloc(9) while holding a spin lock" case. Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200906101917.26977.jkim>