Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:17:02 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.1 BETA 2 vs Opensolaris vs Ubuntu performance Message-ID: <200811251716.mAPHGreB063704@lava.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <d763ac660811250906q7be1e093yb2bf1ac6ecf52d3b@mail.gmail.co m> References: <DE23C2B055DA4BC683BDCAA95FF7B736@multiplay.co.uk> <200811242107.mAOL7JB9058269@lava.sentex.ca> <d763ac660811250906q7be1e093yb2bf1ac6ecf52d3b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:06 PM 11/25/2008, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>2% may not sound like a lot but it starts becoming measurable savings
>when the number of boxes involved is ${LARGE}.
True, but then again is there such a thing as a synthetic benchmark
that would have a margin of error less than 2% while representing
your real world application mix?
---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200811251716.mAPHGreB063704>