Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:51:33 -0500 (EST) From: chris@netmonger.net To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: bin/16885: chflags/setflags lost several flags Message-ID: <200002211851.NAA01357@lion-around.at.yiff.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 16885 >Category: bin >Synopsis: chflags/setflags lost several flags >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Feb 21 11:00:01 PST 2000 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Christopher Masto >Release: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386 >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #4: Sat Feb 19 19:26:06 EST 2000 /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/setflags.c: $FreeBSD: src/lib/libc/gen/setflags.c,v 1.14 2000/01/27 21:16:53 joe Exp $ >Description: Revision 1.12 of lib/libc/gen/setflags.c, despite the innocuous log message "Rewriting of flags_to_string() and string_to_flags() to use an array", deleted several flags: SF_NOUNLINK UF_NOUNLINK, and UF_OPAQUE. chflags(1) and chflags(2) still claim that these flags exist. >How-To-Repeat: chris@lion-around:/tmp$ touch foo; chflags uunlnk foo chflags: invalid flag: uunlnk >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002211851.NAA01357>