Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:51:46 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" <dghatikachalam@gmail.com> To: "David Robillard" <david.robillard@gmail.com>, "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Question:encryption tool. Message-ID: <ba29b9b40702060951y46e2a65cveb34c5fc58f3ce03@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <226ae0c60702060602x20e34eb9w715c786dbf6dd34e@mail.gmail.com> References: <226ae0c60702060602x20e34eb9w715c786dbf6dd34e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/6/07, David Robillard <david.robillard@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks a lot, Our current backup system is veritas netbackup, and > changing > > that to entire bacula is best thing for me, > > May I ask why you would prefer Bacula over NetBackup? I'm just > curious, because having worked with both, I personally prefer > NetBackup. > > > > so they wanted me encrypt these files, that is on the backup location > > before the netbackup scheduler picks up these files. > > > > Database is getting backed up to a disk location and from there > netbackup > > agent picks up and writes it into the tape , but we have these 13 flat > files > > that go into offsite which really needs encryption and decryption logic > in > > place upon after restore back to disk . > > If those databases are all Oracle instances, then you might want to > take a look at Oracle Secure Backup. It does exactly what you need. > > More info here: > http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/secure-backup/index.html > > Cheers, Thanks a lot , but we are on Oracle9i database, the Oracle secure backup they are talking would be nice on 10G onwards
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ba29b9b40702060951y46e2a65cveb34c5fc58f3ce03>