Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:50:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Charlie Schluting <charlie@schluting.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntop broken? Message-ID: <20030806154724.A65569@cheshire.cat.pdx.edu> In-Reply-To: <1060210078.95208.25.camel@borges> References: <20030806085137.W47031@cheshire.cat.pdx.edu> <20030806153607.U65087@cheshire.cat.pdx.edu> <1060210078.95208.25.camel@borges>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Scott R. wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 22:39, Charlie Schluting wrote:
> > 5BOn Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:57:53AM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Howdy,
> > > > Running 5.0.
> > >
> > > cvsup to 5.1 and retry. The package currently builds on a clean 5.1 system.
> > >
> > > Kris
> >
> > Interesting. So, I tried, and it deleted all my ports. I was using this:
> > Any ideas? Thanks a bunch :)
>
> Yes. Your tag for ports should be '.', so:
>
> *default tag=.
>
> not
>
> *default tag=RELENG_5_1
>
> There is no such animal and that is why it deleted all of your ports
> instead of updating them. In addition, specifying 'ports-all' is
> sufficient ('ports-base' is not needed unless you are only cvsup'ing
> individual collections).
>
> -Scott
Well, that's what I had before.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
says that RELENG_5_1 is valid.
So, if I used *default tag=. previously, that means the previous poster
was wrong? Or was he saying I needed to do the whole make buildworld
thing?
--Charlie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030806154724.A65569>