Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 13:38:03 +0000 From: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/elf2aout elf2aout.c Message-ID: <20020521133802.GB5716@FreeBSD.ORG> In-Reply-To: <20020521093456.GA74330@sunbay.com> References: <200205200756.g4K7ueM28492@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020520125748.E8089@espresso.q9media.com> <20020521074034.GB53675@sunbay.com> <20020521042755.B56179@espresso.q9media.com> <20020521093456.GA74330@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:34:56PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > You'll have to fix <sys/elf32.h> first. Also make sure this > > > still can be bootstrapped from the old versions. > > > > Well it looks like the structure you changed is for aout information, > > so I don't see how <sys/elf32.h> would be significant. But even if it > > were, u_int32_t and uint32_t will always be compatible with each > > other. The only difference being that the latter is portable, which > > is a positive attribute for cross-tools. > > > I know, I was trying to point that <sys/elf32.h> still uses an old > non-portable u_int32_t, and probably should also be fixed. You just lamented having to do 'make includes'. Now, consider that when bootstrapping we use the host includes. I doubt a host uses types it doesn't understand. Think through whether or not changing our header will make a shred of difference. -- jmallett@FreeBSD.org | C, MIPS, POSIX, UNIX, BSD, IRC Geek. http://www.FreeBSD.org | The Power to Serve Vote for me for FreeBSD core or the cute little bunny gets it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020521133802.GB5716>