Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:20:30 +0100 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Dave Duchscher <daved@nostrum.com> Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-14:03.pkg Message-ID: <CAFHbX1JGmwS2kD2ph245Eo1hjV%2BVVUwnGt1s54cgfzHHh4C=oQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140616115928.GL4747@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201405140000.s4E002sO029919@freefall.freebsd.org> <D4810186-8CB0-450B-8C32-6E180DB6E7A8@nostrum.com> <20140616115928.GL4747@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > I'm really sorry to hear that, how could we have improved our communication to > reduce the inpact on users like the one you had? (what would you have expected?) > ISTM that the earlier you jumped on to pkgng the more it hurt you. I thought I'd waited until it was stable, and re-wrote my jail deployment process to bootstrap pkgng and set up my own repo, only to have it repeatedly break - by changing how to run the bootstrap, and then changing how repos are organized. Eg I had a jail that perfectly happily was updating from my repo, pkg gets upgraded on the jail, it cannot recognise the configuration for my repo anymore and starts pulling from a completely different repo! I get that getting things perfectly right first time is hard, but it seems that things were changed to the "right" way without too much thought about people doing it the "current" way - and that's a pain. Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1JGmwS2kD2ph245Eo1hjV%2BVVUwnGt1s54cgfzHHh4C=oQ>