Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:07:30 -0500 From: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net> To: Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> Cc: hetzels@westbend.net, jeh@FreeBSD.ORG, joseph@randomnetworks.com, lioux@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, nbm@mithrandr.moria.org, Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> Subject: Re: Multiple packages from one port Message-ID: <200201040009.g0409g941564@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> In-Reply-To: <20020103184154.A85594@databits.net> References: <20020103164130.D82299@databits.net> <200201032313.g03NDPf56011@aldan.algebra.com> <20020103184154.A85594@databits.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 03 January 2002 18:41, Pete Fritchman wrote: > besides adding more ports. Since you don't seem to want to help out on > making this multi-package-from-one-port stuff happening, can you just Pete, on my queue for this weekend is looking at the OpenBSD MULTI_PACKAGE stuff. Also the FAKE stuff, since make package-no-installed *is* stuffed in a number of cases[1]. [Will, I know you don't like the fake stuff, but can you give me a good reason why being able to build a package without touching the installed files on a system is not a desirable goal?] If make DESTDIR=/foo install package behaved according to POLA, this problem wouldn't exist. It shouldn't make the package including DESTDIR in the tarball paths. Bleah!!! Hey, they took ports from us, so there's no reason why we can't steal ideas back from them. It's BSD license, after all. :) -- Alan Eldridge Pmmfmffmmfmp mmmpppppffmpmfpmpppff $PffMmmPppMpmPpfPpm mfpmmmmmfpmpmpppff. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201040009.g0409g941564>