Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 13:39:16 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: conf/11376 still suspended Message-ID: <20020511133916.A57152@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20020511030739.D78014@mail.webmonster.de>; from karsten@rohrbach.de on Sat, May 11, 2002 at 03:07:39AM %2B0200 References: <20020509233557.A35087@xor.obsecurity.org> <200205101347.JAA21782@rapier.goldsword.com> <20020510170109.A55363@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020511030739.D78014@mail.webmonster.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 03:07:39AM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > Kris Kennaway(kris@obsecurity.org)@2002.05.10 17:01:09 +0000: > > There's also the important point that -stable is entirely the wrong > > list to be asking on, because it's a technical support list and not a > > development list. >=20 > one might note that there's the -qa mailing list which should hold > discussion on issues pending a release, IIRC. >=20 > the question is, if -stable isn't a bad choice either. I already said it's not, because it's a support list and not a development list. Patches should not be sent there, nor should there be discussion of proposed changes to FreeBSD-current. Kris --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE83YF0Wry0BWjoQKURAgZ7AKDS0yXm2Ta7ilOfEYCF+k7dNobobACgyz4g Ro0IrKuuTjtxKk3vDIsv4Mg= =cqB3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020511133916.A57152>