Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 16:20:45 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: smp@freebsd.org, tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp Subject: RE: socket buffers and condition variables Message-ID: <XFMail.20020528162045.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <0GWU00K5X6TYZA@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28-May-2002 Jeffrey Hsu wrote: > > Reduce contention upon locking a socket buffer by replacing tsleep() and > > wakeup() with a condvar. > > I'd prefer if we waited until we had the networking stack all locked up > before measuring and deciding that there is enough contention on socket > buffers to warrant this change. I don't really see how this change avoids contention anyways. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020528162045.jhb>