Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:39:42 +0000 From: "Dave Cottlehuber" <dch@skunkwerks.at> To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, dave.mehler@gmail.com Subject: Re: running poudriere in a jail Message-ID: <f243c015-87b8-4673-9661-012015ce0f47@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPORhP5KGXKtr5d7%2B_3WkbvL=SPnhegZuEmHo-h9dSpSiFPOFQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPORhP5KGXKtr5d7%2B_3WkbvL=SPnhegZuEmHo-h9dSpSiFPOFQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Jul 2019, at 00:29, David Mehler wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Does anyone have a configuration for 12.0 that runs poudriere in it's > own jail? What I mean is I have a jail called portsbuild, and in that > jail I'm running poudriere. It is not on the host, yet it is giving me= > problems, host loaded modules, and it's saying jail.set command not > allowed. >=20 > A working configuration is welcome. >=20 > Thanks. > Dave. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebs= d.org" >=20 Hey Dave What are you trying to achieve? poudriere already runs all builds in jails and if you=E2=80=99re using z= fs, stores all data in separate zroot/poudriere datasets. Hard to get mu= ch cleaner than it already is - aside from a handful of config files and= any ccache data it=E2=80=99s as jailed as you can expect. I bookmarked this a while back, it probably is still sufficient. The ori= ginal site appears to have bitrotted. https://web.archive.org/web/20160324110859/https://www.tobeannounced.org= /2015/02/poudriere-in-a-jail/ Dave
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f243c015-87b8-4673-9661-012015ce0f47>