Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:05:30 +0200
From:      Borja Marcos <BORJAMAR@SARENET.ES>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Memory allocation problems (ZFS/NFS/amd64)
Message-ID:  <A9B46B5C-F44F-4A1B-8989-E0E7CAA70BFA@SARENET.ES>
In-Reply-To: <46F23166.8070908@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <5870F83F-7174-47AA-98AE-C1DE8972E0C8@SARENET.ES>	<fcrmmp$2ug$1@sea.gmane.org> <613318C3-6B66-4758-A0D4-97405D6A1914@SARENET.ES> <46F23166.8070908@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 20 Sep 2007, at 10:37, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> Borja Marcos wrote:
>> On 19 Sep 2007, at 19:35, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> Borja Marcos wrote:
>>>
>>>> These are not innocuous messages, the machine is rejecting  
>>>> connections
>>>> like crazy. Any ideas?
>>>> The number of established TCP connections was around 490, and the
>>>> machine has 2 GB of RAM.
>>>
>>> Just a guess: what is your vm.kmem_size_max and have you tried
>>> increasing it?
>> It's the first thing I thought, and I cranked it to a very high  
>> value just in case:
>> vm.kmem_size_max: 1073741824
>
> You actually wanted to tune vm.kmem_size too or it may not actually  
> change the value used (_max is just a ceiling for autotuning).   
> However if this is i386 you can't set it that high without also  
> adjusting KVA_PAGES too (which has other effects).

It's an amd64. I understand that i386 is mostly out of the question  
if I want to play reasonably safe with ZFS :)

Oh, ok. I will try with both, then. Should I try the same value?  
Perhaps it's a bit high, but I understand that with a 64 bit address  
space I can set it sort of arbitrarily high without many side effects.


Thank you very much,






Borja.


----------------
"The thing he realised about the windows was this: because they had  
been converted into openable windows after they had first been  
designed to be impregnable, they were, in fact, much less secure than  
if they had been designed as openable windows in the first place."
    Douglas Adams, "Mostly Harmless"






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A9B46B5C-F44F-4A1B-8989-E0E7CAA70BFA>