Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 10:55:21 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Bob Johnson <bob@eng.ufl.edu> Cc: dcs@newsguy.com, nickhead@folino.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KERNCONF instead of KERNEL? Message-ID: <20010302105521.A29174@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <3A9FEBF1.8C1A5AC4@eng.ufl.edu>; from bob@eng.ufl.edu on Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 01:52:33PM -0500 References: <3A9FEBF1.8C1A5AC4@eng.ufl.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 01:52:33PM -0500, Bob Johnson wrote: > You can't reboot to single user mode when you are doing a remote=20 > update. He is specifically asking about the best way to do=20 > a remote update. You have to do everything multiuser and accept=20 > the risk, but there is still the question of what order minimizes=20 > the risk. The give one is it. It's going to be pretty easy to talk a NOC monkey through booting the system on the old kernel, but damn near impossiable to get them through recovering a system with a busted kernel and a userland that won't work with the old one. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6n+yYXY6L6fI4GtQRAhGxAKCQsUNcw08otXMHGPK2cnB3HMZU6gCdHDOJ PAP/JBE46lBirj8eeEnyEs0= =SVvr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010302105521.A29174>