Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:02:33 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: build tools as separate distribution Message-ID: <20000830110233.C45964@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200008301730.LAA17118@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 11:30:53AM -0600 References: <20000830100126.D45710@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzp3djn9h2o.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20000830100126.D45710@dragon.nuxi.com> <200008301730.LAA17118@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 11:30:53AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20000830100126.D45710@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: > : On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:30:39PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > : > What would the good people think of moving gcc, gas, ld etc., as well > : > as include files and static libraries out of the bin dist and into a > : > separate distribution, called e.g. prog or devel? There are a lot of > : > : You need to convince JKH (as release engineer). I was going to do this > : for 4.2, but he said no. > > I think we can do this for 5.0, however, since I think we can convince > him that it is a good idea. JKH said he plans on having sysinstall changed for 5.0 and true packages. Thus why he said it wasn't worth the effort in -current. I don't think he wanted to rock the boat in -stable. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000830110233.C45964>