Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:20:42 +0900 From: poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp To: David Naylor <dbn@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, python@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] lang/pypy Message-ID: <86k3pfm2g5.wl%poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <1636309.rWBjBGS5Mg@dragon.dg> References: <201303021657.27745.dbn@freebsd.org> <86mwucmvo4.wl%poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp> <1636309.rWBjBGS5Mg@dragon.dg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi David, At Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:18:12 +0300, David Naylor wrote: > > however my translation processes under -DPYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY take 2GB > > for normal binary and 2.5GB for sandboxed one so they aggregate 4.5GB > > to run parallel. > > This is good news. Could you please detail how you measured peak memory? I > might need to retest the port. I heuristically measured them with top(1) RESources, amount of ZFS ARC and swap increased. Oh and free memory after one of translation process finised. I'm afraid I couldn't provide reproducible method for environments for others. > I'll disable the test for now and revise my estimation. Thanks for reporting > back. I wonder where so much difference of memory usage between yours and mine comes from. 5.5GB vs 2.5GB on the same platform (64bit/pypy) is not so negligible. -- Kuro <poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp> PS. like this, please. thanks for the offer.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k3pfm2g5.wl%poyopoyo>