Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 22:19:37 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?Andrey_Chernov=2C_=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= <ache@nagual.ru> To: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/comms/kermit/patches patch-ab Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.961211221803.1517A-100000@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <199612111647.IAA24727@precipice.shockwave.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Dec 1996, Paul Traina wrote: > I thought about that too. If you don't need to access the tty ports, you > don't need to access the lock directory. They'll just fail, warn, and go > on. > > Thus my conclusion, if you want kermit usable by everyone, then you make > it setgid. If you want to make it usable by only folks in dialer, you don't. > Either way, it's more flexible to not change out the kermit security model. Ok, I agree, not setgid kermit is better way. I'll commit needed changes ASAP. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.ru> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.961211221803.1517A-100000>