Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:46:55 -0700
From:      "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
To:        <danial_thom@yahoo.com>, "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Beech Rintoul <beech@alaskaparadise.com>
Subject:   RE: FreeBSD  is #1
Message-ID:  <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEBNFEAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060613000605.85741.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Danial Thom
>Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 5:06 PM
>To: Kris Kennaway
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Beech Rintoul
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD is #1
>
>
>
>
>--- Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700,
>> Danial Thom wrote:
>> > Freebsd 4.x no doubt :)
>> 
>> At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more
>> intensive stress testing
>> and QA by the project than 4.x did.  It is
>> stable.
>> 
>> Kris
>> 
>
>I'm not saying that its not, only that I know a
>lot of ISPs and more of them are running 4 than
>6. In fact I know exactly 0 running 6. So
>proclaiming that Freebsd is #1 without qualifying
>what version they are running doesn't really say
>anything.
>

We are running 6 on our news and radius server.
In fact we are gradually switching over to 6.1 for a
lot of things.  But it takes a huge amount of time to
move to new platforms, and it is not something your
customers pay you for doing.

Ted



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEBNFEAA.tedm>