Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:01:50 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/libreadline complete.c rlconf.h shell.c terminal.c src/contrib/libreadline/doc readline.3 Message-ID: <20041021220150.GB67066@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <200410212002.i9LK22mI064024@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200410212002.i9LK22mI064024@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter, On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 08:02:02PM +0000, Peter Wemm wrote: > peter 2004-10-21 20:02:02 UTC >=20 > FreeBSD src repository >=20 > Modified files: > contrib/libreadline complete.c rlconf.h shell.c terminal.c=20 > contrib/libreadline/doc readline.3=20 > Log: > Force these files back off the vendor branch. They should NEVER have b= een > put back on there in the first place. :-( > =20 > Note that complete.c will need a readline 5.0 merge. > =20 > Revision Changes Path > 1.10 +238 -51 src/contrib/libreadline/complete.c > 1.9 +23 -7 src/contrib/libreadline/doc/readline.3 > 1.6 +1 -0 src/contrib/libreadline/rlconf.h > 1.8 +5 -0 src/contrib/libreadline/shell.c > 1.6 +8 -11 src/contrib/libreadline/terminal.c >=20 So why it was a problem putting these files back on their vendor branch? Do you have an insight why CVSup didn't reset the branch for some people? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBeDHOqRfpzJluFF4RArJDAJ9Fho5/383k2HWkEmCo+p4OTZETVgCcDLjQ 9vqhv/UgpDs8WkEn1NZCnKU= =K/Ka -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041021220150.GB67066>