Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Dec 2001 21:40:58 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   the condvar stuff.
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112262134100.85465-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Ok, so, I[ve looked at the code,
I've read teh man pages. 
I've looked at soem usages..


Why do we need the condvar stuff? it seems very similar
to the existing msleep code.

Now we have:
msleep
mutexes,
condvars
sx locks
(on the way out) lockmanager

I'm not sure I see what you can achieve with convars 
that you can't achieve with msleep().
However it's unlikely that someone would have gone to so much trouble
for no reason, so I'm missing something..
Are they only implimented as a building block for sx locks?



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0112262134100.85465-100000>