Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:55:36 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: rrs@freebsd.org Cc: perforce@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 136802 for review Message-ID: <20080304.155536.1493775479.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200803041133.m24BXMQ2088921@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200803041133.m24BXMQ2088921@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200803041133.m24BXMQ2088921@repoman.freebsd.org>
"Randall R. Stewart" <rrs@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: PG_XXX -> PTE_XXX
The PG_xxx ones that should remain are the ones that the MI code uses,
no? That's how we got PG_CACHE and PG_CACHED in the first place...
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080304.155536.1493775479.imp>