Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 04:33:13 -0600 From: Austin English <austinenglish@gmail.com> To: linimon@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/143351: [request] update flex(1) to at least 2.5.33 Message-ID: <b6bb06271002010233r7f15b104r2a7c30b39418ade0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201001300048.o0U0mkwD096197@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201001300048.o0U0mkwD096197@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:48 PM, <linimon@freebsd.org> wrote: > Old Synopsis: update flex to at least 2.5.33 > New Synopsis: [request] update flex(1) to at least 2.5.33 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->suspended > State-Changed-By: linimon > State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 30 00:45:41 UTC 2010 > State-Changed-Why: > Mark suspended awaiting someone to take up the (hard) task of deciding > if this will create regressions. =C2=A0See: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-January/002233.ht= ml > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D143351 Indeed, it does. I did a build world to make sure it worked (using the freebsd9 snapshot), then installed flex 2.5.35 and rebuilt. /usr/src/cddl failed to build, and possible others (ran make -k, but haven't checked the log yet). Should I file bugs for each program that doesn't build in newer flex? or sit back and wait for someone to fix flex for BSD and then include it? --=20 -Austin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b6bb06271002010233r7f15b104r2a7c30b39418ade0>