Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:28:37 +0100 From: Volker Stolz <vs@FreeBSD.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Max recursion level (500) exceeded. Message-ID: <20050320172837.GA86028@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: <423BA1EC.9020806@FreeBSD.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0503181929500.13080-100000@pancho> <423BA1EC.9020806@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports, you wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>>The problem lies in the gcc32 port. It redefines USE_GCC. It, and the >>>other gcc ports, need not to do that. >> >> >> IIRC gcc3.2 had a USE_GCC definition that its internal make stuff >> needed whose existance predated the creation of bsd.gcc.mk which >> introduced a USE_GCC variable intended to be used internal to the >> ports framework which has different semantics. AFAIK gcc32 has >> been broken since that time. >> >> I do not have time to test this hypothesis but would suggest trying >> a patchset with s/USE_GCC/INTERNAL_USE_GCC/ or something. >> >> It would be great if someone could investigate and fix this problem ... > > Here is a simple solution. > First of all, OOo needs to remove the gcc32 BUILD_DEPENDS, and replace > it with USE_GCC=3.2. > Then, for each gcc port, simply replace the USE_GCC=2.7+ line with > .undef USE_GCC > > If people want to test this, I'll commit it. *sigh* I just spent some time getting my head around this. If I understand this correctly, there's no problem at all on 4.x because gcc-2 is sufficient, and the .undef doesn't seem to change anything. I wish I'd never touched this in the first place. -- http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/stolz/ *** PGP *** S/MIME
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050320172837.GA86028>