Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:16:03 -0500 (EST) From: Jason Slagle <raistlin@tacorp.net> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Discussion on the future of floppies in 5.x and 6.x Message-ID: <20040109151524.T94465@mail.tacorp.net> In-Reply-To: <3FFDC218.60607@aueb.gr> References: <20040107235737.I32227@pooker.samsco.home> <20040108075811.GJ48603@over-yonder.net> <20040108095207.GA52153@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <20040108171108.GA6216@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <3FFDC218.60607@aueb.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Diomidis Spinellis wrote: > I presume the above means a PXE *client*. This would be cool, but by no > means trivial. I looked at this in the past when I wanted to network > boot FreeBSD on a couple of machines that did not support a boot ROM and > reached a dead end; I ended up using PicoBSD and NFS-mounting most of > the stuff. What about etherboot? Doesn't it do exactly this? Jason -- Jason Slagle - CCNP - CCDP /"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign . X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . / \ - NO Word docs in e-mail .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040109151524.T94465>