Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:12:06 +0700
From:      Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>
To:        Norman Gray <norman.gray@glasgow.ac.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The recommended LaTeX port?
Message-ID:  <20180820091205.GA38355@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
In-Reply-To: <8929E48B-15EF-47C7-9F4E-044C0261EA17@glasgow.ac.uk>
References:  <20180819134150.GA18805@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <20180819161317.9bfdac7f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20180820015337.GA24423@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <8929E48B-15EF-47C7-9F4E-044C0261EA17@glasgow.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Norman Gray wrote:
> 
> 
> > Which is *the* \LaTeX distribution for FreeBSD currently?
> 
> I don't know specifically about the 'for FreeBSD' part, but I can make a 
> couple of points about (La)TeX variants.  TeXLive is currently the 
> dominant TeX distribution.  The canonical source of that is 
> <http://tug.org/texlive/>.

[dd]

> 
> You might be interested, Victor, in xe(la)tex or lua(la)tex, which are 
> also in TeXLive.  These are two friendly forks of TeX which use Unicode 
> internally -- so the source file can be cyrilllic with no 
> \usepackage{inputenc} complications.
> 
> Both XeTeX and LuaTeX also use platform fonts, rather than only TeX or 
> postscript fonts, which can be very convenient, if you're not concerned 
> with making your source document portable.  There are a few interesting 
> features which are unique to either XeTeX or LuaTeX -- both of these 
> are, in a sense, the laboratories of the TeX world -- but the fonts 
> capability which they both have is the one that most people are 
> interested in.
> 
> If your goal is to produce documents with Cyrillic content, as 
> painlessly as possible, 

True.

> than I think you'd be best using XeTeX or 
> LuaTeX, and restraining yourself from doing anything fancy with fonts.

Thanks for the insight, Norman! 

Are XeTeX and LuaTeX also in the FreeBSD ports collection? I've just
installed print/texlive-full, are they part thereof?

> ShareLaTeX was acquired by Overleaf.com a little while ago.  That
> brings the number of such services, that I'm aware of, down to one.

I've just received an E-mail from Dr. LianTze Lim of Overleaf Support,
with recommendations about enabling Cyrillic. They were very useful.

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
AS43859



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180820091205.GA38355>