Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:56:55 +0300 (MSK)
From:      Igor Timkin <ivt@logger.gamma.ru>
To:        Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_inode.c ffs_softdep.c         src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_extern.h ufs_lookup.c
Message-ID:  <200012131856.VAA31227@logger.gamma.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200012130830.eBD8UbJ17674@freefall.freebsd.org> "from Kirk McKusick at Dec 13, 2000 00:30:37 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
linking kernel.debug
ffs_inode.o: In function `ffs_truncate':
/sys/compile/NEWSFEED/../../ufs/ffs/ffs_inode.c:185: undefined reference to `softdep_slowdown'
ufs_lookup.o: In function `ufs_dirremove':
/sys/compile/NEWSFEED/../../ufs/ufs/ufs_lookup.c(.text+0x1175): undefined reference to `softdep_slowdown'
*** Error code 1

Kernel without SOFTUPDATES.

Kirk McKusick writes:
> mckusick    2000/12/13 00:30:37 PST
> 
>   Modified files:
>     sys/ufs/ffs          ffs_inode.c ffs_softdep.c 
>     sys/ufs/ufs          ufs_extern.h ufs_lookup.c 
>   Log:
>   Preventing runaway kernel soft updates memory, take three.
>   Previously, the syncer process was the only process in the
>   system that could process the soft updates background work
>   list. If enough other processes were adding requests to that
>   list, it would eventually grow without bound. Because some of
>   the work list requests require vnodes to be locked, it was
>   not generally safe to let random processes process the work
>   list while they already held vnodes locked. By adding a flag
>   to the work list queue processing function to indicate whether
>   the calling process could safely lock vnodes, it becomes possible
>   to co-opt other processes into helping out with the work list.
>   Now when the worklist gets too large, other processes can safely
>   help out by picking off those work requests that can be handled
>   without locking a vnode, leaving only the small number of
>   requests requiring a vnode lock for the syncer process. With
>   this change, it appears possible to keep even the nastiest
>   workloads under control.
>   
>   Submitted by:	Paul Saab <ps@yahoo-inc.com>
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.66      +3 -3      src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_inode.c
>   1.80      +160 -71   src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c
>   1.29      +2 -1      src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_extern.h
>   1.42      +7 -2      src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_lookup.c
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012131856.VAA31227>