Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:15:22 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
To:        Olivier Vautrin <ovautrin@chez.com>
Cc:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Tomcat 5.0 and diablo-jdk-1.3.1 crash
Message-ID:  <16480.21642.483269.373823@emerger.yogotech.com>
In-Reply-To: <000a01c410be$2fd38b00$0b00000a@olivier>
References:  <16479.746.177628.767075@emerger.yogotech.com> <ALPHA3HvoFOAmEaJswF00015f77@alpha.jnpr.net> <16479.12788.232120.392455@emerger.yogotech.com> <001401c4104a$7488c040$0b00000a@olivier> <16479.26655.720587.641745@emerger.yogotech.com> <000a01c410be$2fd38b00$0b00000a@olivier>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It was the native version.

Weird.  It works great for me.  Are you *sure* you were using the native
1.4, as with 32MB of ram, it wouldn't have enough memory to compile the
native 1.4 stuff?

> If nobody have ideas, I will try to reinstall everything but I prefer to
> delay as much as possible...
> 
> Nate, Are you using Tomcat 5.0? Do you think that my problem with the JDK1.4
> can come from my Tomcat?

I am using Tomcat 5.  And, for what it's worth, I installed JBoss3 last
night and it's working great!


Nate

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Nate Williams" <nate@yogotech.com>
> To: "Olivier Vautrin" <ovautrin@chez.com>
> Cc: "Nate Williams" <nate@yogotech.com>; <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 11:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0 and diablo-jdk-1.3.1 crash
> 
> 
> > > It is a Pentium 133 Mhz with 32MB RAM.
> >
> > I would think this would work, but who knows.
> >
> > > I tried with another JDK: the JDK-1.4.2 (not the diablo-jdk). I doesn't
> work
> > > but I have an other kind of error. The java start for 10-20 seconds and
> then
> > > crash with the following log:
> >
> > Which JDK1.4?  The linux or native JVM?  I had
> > problems with the linux version, but the native one works great for me
> > on the box where the others don't.  (And yes, I just went through this
> > on a couple of boxes, so I've standardized on my home-compiled native
> > JDK1.4 version on both boxes).
> >
> > > Which JDK is supposed to be the more stable?
> >
> > JDK1.3.1 is supposed to be stable, and it is on my P4 box.  However,
> > I've personally found the 1.4 JVM to be more stable/usable on all my
> > machines, so am slowing moving everything to using it.
> >
> >
> > Nate
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16480.21642.483269.373823>