Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:32:48 +0100
From:      Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com>
To:        jhell <jhell@dataix.net>
Cc:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: something fails with svn
Message-ID:  <6101e8c41001011632y2e72e8fbw8869d376f3616e5d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B3E9166.90809@DataIX.net>
References:  <6101e8c40912291418w25b46700hb14c53ee414010da@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912292328280.1924@qvzrafvba.5c.ybpny> <20091231111843.GT64905@hoeg.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912312138140.39007@qvzrafvba.5c.ybpny> <20100101112417.GU64905@hoeg.nl> <4B3E9166.90809@DataIX.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
the problem is at a standstill above always, only I did not see a
sense so since I did not receive constructive feedback v=E9=E1aszolni...
otherwise i tested more things, but the situation did not change.

// sorry for bad english, but I never learned it..

On 1/2/10, jhell <jhell@dataix.net> wrote:
> On 1/1/2010 6:24 AM, Ed Schouten wrote:
>> * jhell<jhell@DataIX.net>  wrote:
>>> With those remarks I will leave it up to your honed skills to figure ou=
t.
>>
>> If you don't have anything constructive to say, please refrain from
>> responding to any message on these lists. The purpose of these lists is
>> to help each other.
>>
>
> You know really... I did not see anything that you have replied with to
> be constructive criticism "At all".
>
> And personally if you really want to reply with remarks of "Would you
> mind sharing your findings Sherlock Holmes" You can then keep your
> comments to your self as I do not find them useful and my name is not
> Sherlock Holmes.
>
> Secondly I would expect a much more intelligent remark to come from
> someone with your background but I guess that comes with age.
>
> So my suggestion in constructiveness to you would be to think harder
> before you critique a post of the very same nature as the one you posted.
>
> As regards to the OP the email was meant as a confirmation to the author
> that the problem did lye on his end and that by paying closer attention
> to "the paths" that were displayed in the OP would have revealed the
> problem.
>
> --
>
>   jhell
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6101e8c41001011632y2e72e8fbw8869d376f3616e5d>