Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:12:25 +0200 From: Paolo Pisati <flag@libero.it> To: FreeBSD_Net <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Differences between netgraph nodes in 4.x and 5.x Message-ID: <20030729161225.GA231@newluxor.skynet.org> In-Reply-To: <20030729141641.GA257@newluxor.skynet.org> References: <20030728224737.GA47439@newluxor.skynet.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307281905130.8223-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20030729103042.GA230@newluxor.skynet.org> <20030729141641.GA257@newluxor.skynet.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote: > > well, i answer to myself: > > it seems it's not my mistake, cause you can trigger it with a > plain original tee node too. =P Ok, i promise this is the last msg: it was my mistake, whe i deleted the tee node, the ether node short circuited the lower & upper hook, and then it was impossibile to connect again something to the ether hook. solution: rmhook one of the ether hook, and connect again mynode... =P maybe it would be nice to change the error msg from: "File exists" to "hook already connected" or something like this. bye -- Paolo GUFI: http://www.gufi.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030729161225.GA231>