Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 09:55:23 -0700 From: "Michael W. Akers" <mwakers@home.com> To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, 'Raymond Cummins' <rcummins@netaxs.com> Subject: RE: Linux the choice of crackers? Message-ID: <01BEF460.1CCF54A0@c67050-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Raymond, Yes to all of the above. Yes Linux is the choice of crackers and yes It has so many holes in it that it is easily cracked. This is why I find it so amusing when Security Issues come up, every one screams about Microsoft and completely ignore the fact that the os or application they use has just as many problems if not more. As for the nameserver, NT, Solaris, HP-UX, FreeBSD, do NOT exhibit this behavior. Michael Akers M. Akers Enterprises Unix/NT Systems Administration and Systems Integration. ---------- From: Raymond Cummins [SMTP:rcummins@netaxs.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 7:36 AM To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Linux the choice of crackers? Why is it that my network is always scanned from nameservers running Linux? Is Linux the choice of crackers, or is it so easily cracked that it just appears that way? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01BEF460.1CCF54A0>