Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:43:41 +0300
From:      "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
To:        Andrew Vylegzhanin <avv314@gmail.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Subject:   Re: Is netmap jumbo frames broken in STABLE?
Message-ID:  <5756C17D.1090409@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BBi_YiqcOTw7T_dDzjis8yFu7oGd8G-av2BEaStXFiU7ovUCw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CA%2BBi_YhqCnt5pQ_hC5zWdBp24=Zn3Rcj29AwtMrguPhSoJZSdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2BjcT_E4osrTB00%2Bf0gwSCoG_Zy%2BVdU8LXndqsjnmxPQ3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFMmRNy=PEFOxM4tGM7TQqpMnhTba17ACiaOcfuG8fkDET0RZw@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BBi_YiqcOTw7T_dDzjis8yFu7oGd8G-av2BEaStXFiU7ovUCw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--cPEtbGKx7erBTgBdGKgdWWvSV0JERXWi5
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="6E0JO9m0tg2pjRP7HmtWlBmwx1AeO0Nsx"
From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
To: Andrew Vylegzhanin <avv314@gmail.com>,
 "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Cc: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Message-ID: <5756C17D.1090409@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: Is netmap jumbo frames broken in STABLE?
References: <CA+Bi_YhqCnt5pQ_hC5zWdBp24=Zn3Rcj29AwtMrguPhSoJZSdQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hQ2+jcT_E4osrTB00+f0gwSCoG_Zy+VdU8LXndqsjnmxPQ3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFMmRNy=PEFOxM4tGM7TQqpMnhTba17ACiaOcfuG8fkDET0RZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+Bi_YiqcOTw7T_dDzjis8yFu7oGd8G-av2BEaStXFiU7ovUCw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+Bi_YiqcOTw7T_dDzjis8yFu7oGd8G-av2BEaStXFiU7ovUCw@mail.gmail.com>

--6E0JO9m0tg2pjRP7HmtWlBmwx1AeO0Nsx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 07.06.16 15:22, Andrew Vylegzhanin wrote:
> Just for support Luigi assumption.
>=20
> I've tested on 11.0-ALPHA1 (r301204).
> Same situation with frame size 5166 and works _well_ with frame size 40=
32.

This was changed in
	https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D283883

In the ixgbe_init_locked() initialization of adapter->rx_mbuf_sz was
limited to MJUMPAGESIZE. But I'm agree with Ryan, with this
configuration it works more reliable.

--=20
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov


--6E0JO9m0tg2pjRP7HmtWlBmwx1AeO0Nsx--

--cPEtbGKx7erBTgBdGKgdWWvSV0JERXWi5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXVsGBAAoJEAHF6gQQyKF6tJ8H/131BlPBIh9UIoSmyKdQqUDv
OJTpqik0ldhz7l8m77OSTNNbAlMBa+lKTV48pPC7OMXLg4A4V3uhgH+gqIMtGcYk
F1LJFw9/UsxpZ1hrHi6RMhE7V+rMwC9Z47V+9DqdK8FH+q+/bnrN2SJnD6KQ++dx
8MOekPTAVFhhEr45F7UGpyZFtoFCnX3QVAUDvhbmMy4OloNlgr8hkgZNkqlzd/I4
lt8R9oegc4mVJG4W5AttWZ0DtJyI9tsIUuYU2aF8cSP943E5YNU0Lni/A9iBasFt
mjMw7hc0OukNM2fvfoQdC8ut0thU0LUvB7QAIEUivNFMCVru9/f2JCmy8H+OdvY=
=7XFd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cPEtbGKx7erBTgBdGKgdWWvSV0JERXWi5--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5756C17D.1090409>