Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:11:52 -0400 From: Jim Trigg <jtrigg@spamcop.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: texinfo vs. emacs... Message-ID: <20130621191151.GB46303@spamcop.net> In-Reply-To: <20130621171843.GB78584@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <CAG5KPzy_1hfJ101KrSufxvg_wdv%2B%2Bjo4iyEw%2BJo37TTjXgM0kg@mail.gmail.com> <51C46978.2010102@freebsd.org> <CAG5KPzxJW8nPFiVvuEt0EUOPMUAk=ATY20Oud=JWxPE4s2%2B5rg@mail.gmail.com> <20130621171843.GB78584@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 07:18:43PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > On 21 June 2013 15:55, Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > On 21/06/2013 14:34, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > >> Installing texinfo-5.1.20130419_1...pkg-static: texinfo-5.1.20130419_1
> > >> conflicts with emacs-24.3,3 (installs files into the same place).
> > >> Problematic file: /usr/local/info/info.info.gz
> > >>
> > >> There doesn't seem to be any clean way to fix this ... hints?
> > >
> > > Add
> > >
> > > PERMISSIVE : yes
> > >
> > > to ${LOCALBASE}/etc/pkg.conf
> > >
> > > It's not really clean in that it just allows packages to stomp over each
> > > other's files, but it lets you get the job done.
> >
> > Also, is there an env flag that does the same thing?
> >
> All configuration in pkg.conf can also be set by env flags. so PERMISSIVE=yes
> will do the same.
OK, is there a way to do this for specific ports so that an administrator
can approve specific combinations of ports without giving blanket
permission?
Thanks,
Jim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130621191151.GB46303>