Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 02:36:45 +0900 (JST) From: Hajimu UMEMOTO (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCR19LXBsoQiAbJEJIJRsoQg==?=) <ume@mahoroba.org> To: itojun@iijlab.net Cc: ache@freebsd.org, alex@big.endian.de, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/net res_init.c res_send.c Message-ID: <20000617.023645.74755484.ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <2647.961120554@coconut.itojun.org> References: <20000615185200.A40608@freebsd.org> <2647.961120554@coconut.itojun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:55:54 +0900 >>>>> itojun@iijlab.net said: >There are following possibilities: >1) No /etc/resolv.conf >2) /etc/resolv.conf with several nameservers >2a) /etc/resolv.conf with nameserver 0.0.0.0 All of these are checked with IPv4/IPv6 kernel and IPv4 only kernel. itojun> ume, you really want to look at the latest kame libineet6/resolv/. itojun> the code is much more conservative about backward compatibility itojun> (selecting _res.nsaddr_list and _res_ext.nsaddr_list). I read your commit message of KAME CVS. Then, I had look around resent res_init.c and res_send.c of kame/libinet6, and changed the code. I believe I already mereged corresponding code. If I forgot to merge the part should be merged, please tell me. Thanks. itojun> make sure to check if nslookup/dig/host work right. they touch itojun> struct _res directly and will make it a good torture-test for backward itojun> compatibility I just tried nslookup/dig/host of WC-CDROM 4.0-RELEASE live filesystem with IPv4/IPv6 kernel and IPv4 only kernel, and it seems working. -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000617.023645.74755484.ume>