Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:23:25 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@acm.org> Cc: Nevermind <never@nevermind.kiev.ua>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING Message-ID: <20020118182325.B60750@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <200201181557.g0IFvbi44263@bmah.dyndns.org> References: <20020118151109.GA35506@nevermind.kiev.ua> <200201181557.g0IFvbi44263@bmah.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 07:57:37AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Nevermind wrote: > > > I suppose we should note that using in kernel "maxusers 0" > > is now default and recomended setting now. > > UPDATING is for issues that could potentially cause a system to break > during an upgrade. This isn't one of them. > I agree. Let's not make UPDATING another relnotes copy. :-) > PS. It *is* noted in the release notes however, as well as tuning(7). > But you probably knew that already. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020118182325.B60750>