Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 May 2005 16:05:33 +0300
From:      Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
To:        Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        Oliver Brandmueller <ob@e-Gitt.NET>
Subject:   Re: Strange top(1) output 
Message-ID:  <E1DWDNe-0005AE-3p@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: Message from Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>  of "Wed, 11 May 2005 13:24:47 EDT." <42823FDF.7060106@mac.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:54:59AM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> >>Wasn't the old max length of GECOS 8 chars? Setting it to anything less 
> >>starts to become too short -- You're better off just outputting the UID.
> > 
> > I vote for removing (or make it optional) the code that measures 
> > username lengths. I have a system with >90k users (in LDAP) and it takes 
> > quite some time to find out the longest (just to cut the number down to 
> > 13 afterwards anyway). This even happens with "-u" in the standard top.
> 
> +1.  It's silly to scan the list of users to find the length of the longest 
> username, just in order to make the output *not* fit into 80 columns.  :-)

maybe the time has come to drop the 80 col. limit? it's been around for more
that 100 years, and screens (most of them) can be streched :-)

danny




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1DWDNe-0005AE-3p>