Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 08:15:20 -0800 From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dependencies satisfied, build stops anyway. Message-ID: <20171126161519.GB77654@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1s1cT2w8UP9BLjm1k=hUSJxHEJar2ECp3rVH2LKdDnPCw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20171123051228.GA64807@www.zefox.net> <2ab2735988a2d2dee23f00834dee872b@udns.ultimatedns.net> <CAN6yY1unNAE5n-1e0dp9cyfR=5DFjxk_h2gMLrGB2CvgGZCxCA@mail.gmail.com> <20171124175558.GA70538@www.zefox.net> <CAN6yY1spiKTahReLuAbO3oE8bCQXr28%2BMeU-D%2BmPTuXshj8kDw@mail.gmail.com> <20171125185425.GA74836@www.zefox.net> <CAN6yY1sCist1cz5%2BNuw6=w3Cj5pO=-3uOcfQUaL_ODjdufttWg@mail.gmail.com> <20171126071841.GA77654@www.zefox.net> <CAN6yY1s1cT2w8UP9BLjm1k=hUSJxHEJar2ECp3rVH2LKdDnPCw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:38:41PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Bob, > > BATCH is not deprecated, but it's "portmaster -mBATCH x11/xorg". You also > don't need to cd to the port directory for portmaster. > BATCH is a make variable. (See man portmaster). Ihave not used BATCH in a > while. It is possible that you need "-mBATCH=yes". > The command running is make -DBATCH in /usr/ports/x11/xorg. Portmaster simply didn't run, whether in /usr/ports or /usr/ports/x11/xorg. This morning, there was a dialog box asking if llvm4 should be built. Knowing that the system already uses llvm5 I unselected all the boxes and hit ok. The system reported downloading llvm4, but then promptly moved on to to other software, so I am doubtful it actually did anything with the files. Altogether it seems that ports building has changed significantly. Whether it's intrinsic to ports, or an artifact of my system, is unclear. The change seems to have occurred around the armv6/v7 split, but that bears no obvious connection. It also coincides with the use of /tmp directories for compilation, which might be more relevant. If this isn't a local problem it seemingly must be arm or possibly rpi2-related. Thanks again for reading! bob prohaska > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:18 PM, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 10:03:02PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 10:54 AM, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps it's time to eliminate all record of installed ports, > > > > given that the ports management tools don't seem to work correctly, > > > > and start over. Is emptying /usr/local and /var/db/pkg sufficient? > > > > There's no customization of value on the system. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I would expect that to work. It may leave some odds and ends > > hanging, > > > as it is not the way it is normally done. > > > > > There still seems to be something wrong. /usr/local and /var/db/pkg are > > both empty. Make install worked finished successfully for both pkg and > > portmaster, but running portmaster in /usr/ports/x11/xorg produced > > > > root@www:/usr/ports # cd x11/xorg > > root@www:/usr/ports/x11/xorg # portmaster > > > > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/x11/xorg > > > > ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports > > > > ===> Creating some important subdirectories > > ===> Starting chrooted make in /... > > ===> Chrooted make in / succeeded > > ===> Cleaning up... > > ===>>> Gathering dependency list for x11/xorg from ports > > > > ===>>> Cannot cd to /tmp/mountpoint.mcNbXH/graphics/mesa-dri > > ===>>> Aborting update > > > > Thinking there might be a collision problem between old files in /tmp > > I cleared all the mountpoint.xxxxxx files, to no avail. > > > > Subsequently using make -DBATCH in /usr/ports/x11/xorg seems to be > > running a successful attempt, but for some reason configuration > > dialogs are still showing up. Is the -DBATCH flag deprecated? > > > > > They do cooperate in most regards as both call pkg (or pkg-static) to do > > > the pkg related work and portmaster executes "make" with appropriate > > > arguments. The one real difference that you have seen is the portmaster > > > keeps a copy of the distinfo file for all ports it installs so it can do > > > the --clean-distfiles. That is something other tools can't do, but it is > > > not critical. I generally use portmaster, but, when I am hiting problems, > > > will use make(1) to build the port and then use "portmaster -C" to finish > > > the installation. > > > > > > > That seems like a good approach. If the xorg build completes I'll try it. > > > > Thanks for all your counsel! > > > > bob prohaska > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171126161519.GB77654>