Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:03:42 -0700 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Conflicting declarations for ffs() Message-ID: <20021020190342.A11483@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20021021093120.I8562-100000@gamplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:39:40AM %2B1000 References: <20021020195557.972FD2A88D@canning.wemm.org> <20021021093120.I8562-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* De: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> [ Data: 2002-10-20 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Conflicting declarations for ffs() ] > BSD/OS arranges kernel-only MD headers better by not putting them in > <machine>. This also inhibits them being abused in MI code. What do they do, MACHINE_ARCH/MACHINE_ARCH/header.h and pull it in via <MACHINE_ARCH/header.h>? This is a good way to hide things, and is probably an area which won't be exposed (which is correct) in any way in FreeBSD, in the near future, as there's no real need... juli. -- Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> | FreeBSD: The Power To Serve Will break world for fulltime employment. | finger jmallett@FreeBSD.org http://people.FreeBSD.org/~jmallett/ | Support my FreeBSD hacking! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021020190342.A11483>