Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 02:34:31 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Stable List <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: em watchdogs - OS involvement Message-ID: <20071101022946.V4289@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0710301317w8e820f2pdbd7f3ca1e1f6a30@mail.gmail.com> References: <2a41acea0710301317w8e820f2pdbd7f3ca1e1f6a30@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jack Vogel wrote: > Another bit of data, if I define DEVICE_POLLING on the Oct. snap it > also will work. Defining DEVICE_POLLING (globally) breaks configuration of "fast" interrupt handlers in em. I have to #undef it to test "fast" interrupt handlers in em without losing testing of polling in other network drivers. I lose only testing of polling in em. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071101022946.V4289>