Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:06:28 +0200 From: Henrik Brix Andersen <henrik@brixandersen.dk> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: misc/101228: [nanobsd] [patch] Two more entries for FlashDevice.sub Message-ID: <20060802140628.GL17004@osgiliath.opasia.dk> In-Reply-To: <17702.1154526225@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20060802.073232.-494097392.imp@bsdimp.com> <17702.1154526225@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 01:43:45PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I'm afraid I have to agree with Warner here. >=20 > I was hoping that the vendors would standardize on a limited number > of geometries, but it seems that yet again my faith in the wisdom > of hardware vendors is not supported by evidence. So what should happen with the existing entries in FlashDevice.sub? Should we deprecate it alltogether - or leave it as a half-baked solution? Regards, Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen <henrik@brixandersen.dk> --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPG signed iD8DBQFE0LFkv+Q4flTiePgRAuQDAJ0XXoWQ6DcZHmdo1f+TaIRzxm9NMACdGP6d aYuLAkxYTLwA6T9+pHQRkT8= =pKgW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060802140628.GL17004>