Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:48:16 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> To: Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org>, goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com Subject: Re: make install package? Message-ID: <50EF3720.1070306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50EF30C9.9050206@a1poweruser.com> References: <50EF10DB.8070205@a1poweruser.com> <20130110211514.5fd7df427c41f473bca74bd3@gmail.com> <50EF30C9.9050206@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2QQHHDWGDKXPICBLRIFRF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/01/2013 21:21, Fbsd8 wrote: > Is the upcoming pkgng going to have any effect on this? No. The layout of /usr/ports/packages is controlled at a rather lower level by the Makefiles in /usr/ports/Mk. pkgng doesn't really care about this layout in any case since pkgng repositories don't need anything like it. Instead, they have repository catalogues which can fulfil all your package finding needs. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey ------enig2QQHHDWGDKXPICBLRIFRF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDvNygACgkQ8Mjk52CukIz/pgCfaQDqpYGwQvaxOb4auoVZ9aul DhQAn19rzsFZn4yFpilB5S3IDuRPSIaa =Y/Dp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2QQHHDWGDKXPICBLRIFRF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50EF3720.1070306>