Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:14:20 -0800 From: Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: smbfs slow compared to smbclient Message-ID: <50EBB93C.8000709@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <50EBB67E.3040704@aldan.algebra.com> References: <50EBB67E.3040704@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 1/7/13 10:02 PM, Mikhail T. wrote: > Hello! > > I found this same question asked back in 2005, but never answered: > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-September/098717.html > > > > Today, 7 years later, using FreeBSD-9.1 I observe, that copying a > file to an SMB-server (a box with embedded Linux, actually), I get > just under 1Mb/s using an smbfs mount. > > On contrast, uploading the same file to the same remote host using > smbclient runs at between 8 and 9 Mb/s. > > Is this a known discrepancy? Are there tweaks to be applied to the > smbfs mount, that can make it perform better? Thanks! Yours, I think this is a known issue. Davide (cc'ed) had worked on smbfs recently and eliminated Giant on smbfs dependencies so I think he would have a lot of saying on this.. Cheers, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQ67k8AAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzQBAH/jf0FY8EZ+BD+4KKqrpaTmG9 WftAGmnByHUat8OBtb6+Sztkpr14VWcxYNcytTbqH6zMBgeA7koJtuzO8JVpxMM9 Btno2TJkL9zUKC6fkHs5Zd14TNJ/v29CE+6ooQbC4K791PaMcg2vP++Ce9EXmqkA Pew/3846rjhdY0H7weNDtz3G/XBCXEP0i2kq3PH5E9dvazIIXMa3z7KMs4935I29 /PBrNGnaxbXyxUqvLQGlxnR8BZKCewH8camhSNUlbb3gkghug74fwbRw/v8HFZcj SUOV/6ujhcjzmHCGAJsQ+WysCqJb7hFEUOZXbXEEOvmh4Nsm5f4P9JPauv6xs+I= =bZ2X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50EBB93C.8000709>