Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 19:40:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226962] databases/postgis24 Question: How to run postgis24 with postgresql10 ? Message-ID: <bug-226962-7788-mfRVNppQNE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-226962-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-226962-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226962 John Parkey <john@acru.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |john@acru.co.uk --- Comment #3 from John Parkey <john@acru.co.uk> --- I am having a similar problem. I am building using synth, on FreeBSD 11.1. My /etc/make.conf contains a line to add DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpgsql=3D10 I have cleared down the whole environment, so that I am building everything from scratch. First I build postgresql10-server, -client, -contrib, to make sure that they are all there. If I then try to build postgis24, something = in the dependency tree causes postgresql95-server to be pulled in. I stripped it right back and found that graphics/gdal pulls in 17 dependenc= ies, and this results in postgresql95-server being built again. I edited the Makefile for graphics/gdal to include 'pgsql' in the USES directive, but th= is didn't solve the problem. Looking at the dependencies, it wasn't clear to = me what was causing this - I thought that it might be something to do with graphics/libgeotiff, but I couldn't find anything definitive (and, to be honest, I don't really know what I am looking for). I edited /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk and set PGSQL_DEFAULT?=3D 10= - this allowed graphics/gdal to build, and so then I tried databases/postgis24 which pulled in a further 168 dependencies, and everything built cleanly (hurrah! finally some progress after two days). The remaining 728 packages= are building now, so I am hopeful that they will complete without postgresql95 being pulled in again. Clearly what I have done is a bit of a hack, and I risk the bsd.default-versions.mk file being overwritten at some point when I refresh= the ports, but hopefully it will help to narrow down the source of the problem. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226962-7788-mfRVNppQNE>