Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:08:40 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Martin Wilke <miwi.fbsd@gmail.com> Cc: "svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r347338 - in head/net-p2p: . microdc2 microdc2/files Message-ID: <20140307090840.GB98331@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAFY%2ByE=w9rvhzdcC8q2tZvyFQrFQMrxjQ1W7JG4s1rsf-kvtnA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201403070625.s276PGbO062948@svn.freebsd.org> <CAFY%2ByE=w9rvhzdcC8q2tZvyFQrFQMrxjQ1W7JG4s1rsf-kvtnA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 04:41:45PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: > while you restore the port, should you not at least take over the port? Not sure; I thought of it, but then don't know what current maintainer thinks about this. I have a few patches from Debian/Gentoo/Arch to add to the port; once I'm happy with it, I'll ping Pavel and ask why he let the port to get moved, and if he's still willing to maintain it. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140307090840.GB98331>