Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:23:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: James Raynard <jraynard@dial.pipex.com>, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, candy@fct.kgc.co.jp, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO binary compatibility? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960429002126.13387S-100000@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <199604280704.QAA10700@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 28 Apr 1996, Michael Smith wrote: > James Raynard stands accused of saying: > > > > >>>>> Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> writes: > > > > > > Yes, "options COMPAT_IBCS2", kernel rebuild. > > > > Are you sure about that? I don't seem to have that in any of my kernel > > config files (not even LINT). Then again, I've never tried to run any > > SCO binaries... > > Yes, very. You see, I _have_ run SCO binaries. And I checked the kernel > configs on a machine that was at that very moment running a SCO binary, > just to be sure 8) This is a 2.1-R machine? In this case the iBCS2 compatibility options are VERY POORLY defined. To the point that we need to add it to LINT and make an appropriate note in sysconfig. (and Linux while we're at it) Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960429002126.13387S-100000>