Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:20:12 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature Request: /usr/local/etc/rc.conf support Message-ID: <20040221082011.GZ44313@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <B0u%2BLmI4CL@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <49331.207.23.164.8.1077228664.squirrel@mailtest.sd73.bc.ca> <87y8qywx47.fsf@gray.impulse.net> <49331.207.23.164.8.1077228664.squirrel@mailtest.sd73.bc.ca> <20040220135811.GM44313@cicely12.cicely.de> <B0u%2BLmI4CL@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 05:59:41AM +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Bernd Walter schrieb:, > > > A port upgrade is always a problem in shared environment, because they > > often add global start scripts - I don't like to see automatically > > enabled or disabled services in /usr/local/etc/rc.d then. > > I set in my /erc/rc.conf: > local_startup="/usr/local/etc/rc.local" A good idea, but the NetBSD way of doing is still better IMO. NetBSD pkgsrc start scripts depend on foo_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf just as base services. On FreeBSD a small number of ports already do. > so my servers only run scriots that I explicit copy in that dir. I think softlinks are better to keep scripts up to date. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040221082011.GZ44313>