Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 10:10:29 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@corbulon.video-collage.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a scheduling question Message-ID: <20040520151029.GA19455@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <200405200334.i4K3YlGU027751@corbulon.video-collage.com> References: <200405200334.i4K3YlGU027751@corbulon.video-collage.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (May 19), Mikhail Teterin said: > Here is a top's snapshot from a dual CPU machine. Two lame encoders > compete for the first CPU, while the total idle time is 35.6%. Why is > that? Because they are nice? Is niceness really supposed to allow for > wasted CPU? Thanks! You're probably using SCHED_ULE? Try with 4BSD. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040520151029.GA19455>