Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:17:29 +0300 From: Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@yandex.ru> To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world Message-ID: <640331300457849@web22.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4D8245D4.6070705@gmx.de> References: <4D7BED01.6000506@FreeBSD.org> <201103160028.01687.avilla@freebsd.org> <241821300263308@web137.yandex.ru> <201103160933.48175.avilla@freebsd.org> <105381300365591@web53.yandex.ru> <123121300367234@web45.yandex.ru> <4D8245D4.6070705@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
17.03.2011, 20:33, "Matthias Andree" <matthias.andree@gmx.de>: > Not necessarily. šIf it's a documented extension that you'd allowed (and > even by sticking to the implicit gnu89 language default of GCC) then > you'll hardly hear back anything else than "invalid, works as documented". Note that Clang supports c89 and gnu89 modes[1] [1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#c_modes -- Regards, Konstantin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?640331300457849>