Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 May 2007 10:51:32 -0400
From:      Chris Slothouber <chris@hier7.com>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Wider=F8e_Andersen?= <wodfer@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Video fileserver - Need some input
Message-ID:  <4641DFF4.10900@hier7.com>
In-Reply-To: <23ed14b80705090712w31705d1bn9c5580fba8fc7c6e@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <23ed14b80705090521x7036ba6dm57771f694a861eac@mail.gmail.com>	 <4641CD35.3030601@hier7.com> <23ed14b80705090712w31705d1bn9c5580fba8fc7c6e@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2007-05-09 10:12, Andreas Widerĝe Andersen wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Chris Slothouber <chris@hier7.com> wrote:
>> On 2007-05-09 08:21, Andreas Widerĝe Andersen wrote:
>>> I'm planning a new fileserver for my post-production facility and need
>> some
>>> input regarding filesystems and network setup. I've been a FreeBSD fan
>> for
>>> almost 10 years now and will try to build this server based on the
>> latest
>>> stable FreeBSD version, allthough most machines here run WinXP.
>>> In addition to this 1-5 machines will have access to the fileserver
>> through
>>> a shared Gigabit network connection for making DVDs and use the files as
>>> source for editing. In short: There will be two direct 1Gb network
>>> connections and one shared 1Gb connection. Will the server hold up?
>> Depending on the resolution and frame rate of your video, GigE is
>> nowhere near fast enough a pipe for live video manipulation.  This is
>> certainly the case when dealing with broadcast video.
> 
> 
> We're only working in Standard Definition PAL (see the datarates in my first
> post). I have done DV capture tests before over the network and that worked
> fine. We're already having three machines feeding from one server today and
> that works fine too allthough it is a bit slow. We're mainly copying files
> to local drives, but DVD creation happens straight from the server.

My apologies, I totally glazed over that bit.

Samba does have some performance issues out of the box (see Solon Luigi
Lutz's thread from 04-10, similar situation but a little bit more later
in the game).  I believe there are a few tuning options for
Samba<->FreeBSD that might be appropriate, esp. wrt. multi-threading
CIFS.  Google seems to show a lot of hits for that.

Sorry again for missing the info you provided.  I hope this helps.

- --
Chris Slothouber (chris@hier7.com) -=- Mercenary Sysadmin
BIZ: http://www.hier7.com -=- building.better.ideas
PGP: 7A83 F021 5AC3 4BD7 6738 21D8 B348 0B16 79C0 C27F
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGQd/0s0gLFnnAwn8RAvgsAJ9Dr2oFZMMt8sfPbsMtLBJZ3hBc8gCfVRVL
8tgP0nFuv881JKe/ZRkeOQI=
=jq/3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4641DFF4.10900>