Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 08:20:07 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why omshell when no dhcpd ? Message-ID: <20050519152007.GB20960@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050519150311.GA9240@crodrigues.org> References: <20815.1116509187@critter.freebsd.dk> <20050519150311.GA9240@crodrigues.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:03:11AM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:26:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >=20 > > Why do we have the omshell program in the base system when dhcpd is not > > there ? >=20 > Probably no good reason, other than being an artifact of having > isc-dhcp in the base system. I'll be getting rid of it shortly as part of the import of OpenBSD's dhclient. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCjK6nXY6L6fI4GtQRAjfQAJ0WENQtfSHdsbjFGSt5i6gX0n7gDwCeO7KF YAJaqSHvZ9whE2IeG/B9gBI= =gEco -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050519152007.GB20960>