Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:33:43 -0700
From:      "Jeff Mohler" <speedtoys.racing@gmail.com>
To:        nodje <nodje.co@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Installing freeBSD on an Intel RAID5 partition
Message-ID:  <a969fbd10710101333u7b149710m1fdff9f47faccf23@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fc49f00d0710100035j1909c5cgab450f6f3568ab3d@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <fc49f00d0710100035j1909c5cgab450f6f3568ab3d@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Did you know that most "oh my god" RAID failures happen during the
reconstruction of a failed drive?

.Especially on SATA as the non-recoverable-bit-error math is so much
easier to run into.

I think..that on a 500G drive, there are enough bits to read/write
that mathematically you could run into a double-drive failure every
time you have to recover.  Although, statistically it wouldnt happen
every time.

No raid solves any backup problem.

> I've been using those Intel RAID with Windows for a couple of years now and
> it really helped solve my backup problem.
> I think this is simply great, no worries of data loss anymore (at least
> coming from hardware failure).
>
> -nodje
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a969fbd10710101333u7b149710m1fdff9f47faccf23>